michael kors handbags ireland online 365

Coir rope line tools of crime; crime to have loved cloud Have a matter of time before and after the testimony of several witnesses repeatedly Lee, who combined love clouds and Chen Hua Zhang's testimony, the lack of evidence has been found love Clouds crime time. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure Article 195 (c) entry:. 'Insufficient evidence, the defendant is found not guilty, should be made for insufficient evidence, criminal charges can not be established acquittals' Our hospital law I have loved cloud judgment of acquittal. 2, to have loved clouds since acquitted, why is sentenced Chen Zhang guilty of? A: The prosecutor accused the defendant had love clouds, Chen Hua Zhang complicity victim Zhou Yuheng kill our hospital reopened, that the prosecutor accused have loved cloud guilty of intentional homicide facts are unclear and insufficient evidence, but found Chen Zhang guilty of intentional homicide, the fact clear, the evidence is reliable and sufficient. Integrated to the case evidence can be determined, Chen Zhou Yuheng chapter harbor grudges, motivated crime. Zhang and Chen before the incident purchasing large quantities of Valium and served several times into the cups Zhouyu Heng, has since been followed by Zhou Yuheng in Zhouyu Heng has also returned to the bedroom to go after songs by the engineering building engineering to Zhou Yuheng South Building room 308, together with Zhou Yuheng until Zhou Yuheng killed. After Chen Zhang also implemented concealed criminal evidence, cleaning up the site, send text messages and other acts to cover up the truth. Based on the established facts, the court verdict Chen Zhang guilty of intentional homicide and sentenced to life imprisonment and deprivation of political rights for life. Evidence that what, what facts found and accordingly judgment, which is a strong evidence referee principle. 3, the case why the proceedings so long? A: The two accused in this case are the victims of Xiangtan University and a graduate student, major cases, difficult, complex, public concern. The case heard several times through three courts, in case of trial, the court order to ascertain the facts of the case, a lot of work, has always been based on the facts, on the law of the spirit of the review of the evidence, findings of fact be very careful. As I understand it, the Supreme Court, the Hunan Provincial Higher People's Court and the Court judge I have been to the scene, the relevant real evidence